Josh Auerbach -- the weblog of one Joshua Auerbach

Jan 27 2012
PhotoAlt

(via WESLEYAN MAGAZINE)

Why, what a handsome collection of betaworkers that is!

Jan 26 2012

Getting the News — Zach Seward

newsme:

(This post is part of News.me’s ongoing series, “Getting the News.” In our efforts to understand everything about social news, we’re reaching out to writers and thinkers we like to ask them how they get their daily news. Read the first post here. See all of the posts, from writers and thinkers like Anil Dash, Khoi Vinh, and Megan Garber, here.)

This week we reached out to Zach Seward, editor of outreach and social media for the Wall Street Journal. In addition to his writing and editing at the Journal, Zach teaches a class on digital media at NYU. He’s working at the intersection of social media and news every day. Zach warned us that his responses to the questions would be “a little obsessive” — this is one of our longest interviews, featuring Zach’s observations on his own rapacious appetite for news and the digital media landscape. But it’s so good that we wanted to publish all of it. This might be the first and last time we publish the phrase “news blow,” but we could hardly pass up on the opportunity.

1. Describe how you get news throughout the day. What’s the first thing you check when you wake up?

My alarm clock sounds like one of those bright-red bells that might ring in a firehouse to signal an emergency, aptly setting the tone of my morning, which is a bleary scramble to answer: What did I miss?

Lurching out of bed and casting aside the iPad I fell asleep reading, I grab my phone to see what has piled up in my inboxes — work email first, then personal. I’m lucky to be part of a global news organization, so if something has exploded overnight in Kabul, if Asian markets are tanking, if protestors have been evicted from Zuccotti Park, that news will be waiting for me, often as raw dispatches from our staff overseas. My first notice of last year’s earthquake in Japan, for instance, was an inbox full of increasingly alarming emails.

I suppose this kind of news consumption is driven by an unhealthy fear, as though going to sleep were a risk rather than reward. And there’s often little to distinguish a can’t-miss story from a quarterly earnings report: that red LED blinks at the same pace no matter what news has just arrived. Ping. Ping. Ping.

Still, on a good day, email is my best informant. Friends send over links, sources chime in with tips, and strangers reach out to say something unexpected. My inboxes are messy streams not unlike the Twitter timeline or Facebook newsfeed — except that every message is addressed to me.

I also subscribe to scores of newsletters and other automated emails, most of which I delete without reading, which is a cathartic morning ritual. There are only two such emails that I open without exception:

  • News.me’s digest of what my friends are reading and sharing, which is also on the Web. Many services compete in this space, and I’ve tried them all, but News.me is the only one that reliably surfaces links I want to click on. (I’m not just flattering you; it’s true!)
  • Timehop’s diary of my Foursquare check-ins and tweets from a year ago. Sure, that’s not really news so much as nostalgia, but I see it as an improvement on that old newspaper fixture, “This Day in History.”

Before setting my phone back down on my dresser, I also check topheadlin.es, which is a mobile web app that my colleague Jeremy Singer-Vine built. It scans dozens of news sites for the single most-prominent headline on each and displays them in a clean list. If a big story has broken overnight, I will get a quick view of how everyone is playing it. On a lighter morning, topheadlin.es is an efficient glance at the news judgment of news organizations from Al Jazeera to ESPN.

Robin Sloan and Matt Thompson gave an awesome talk last year on designing news for “media moments.” Waiting in line at the supermarket, commuting to work, and seeking a diversion to avoid an awkward conversation in the elevator are all media moments into which news might fit. And I think right-when-you-wake-up may be the ultimate media moment, combining urgency, routine, and a voracious audience, at least after they’ve had some caffeine.

The Internet made me a morning person, I guess.

Read More

Dec 22 2011

liad:

Un-fucking-believable video from British Transport Police.

Alcohol + Trains = DANGEROUS

Dec 12 2011
I will say this for Lowe’s, however (and any other advertisers who may join them in the pullout): I don’t believe they’re bigots. They’re cowards. They’re the kind of penny-ante self-interested cravens who, throughout history, have passively made the work of blatant, active bigots possible.
— Time’s James Poniewozik. Read the whole thing, pretty please. (via kevinerb)

Dec 10 2011

Dec 09 2011
PhotoAlt

Fact: My marriage thrives even though I’m a 6 or 7 and my wife is probably a 3.5.

(via Spaces of Banana Control)

Dec 07 2011

Nov 22 2011
Here is what the committee’s failure is expected to mean: The Navy is likely to mothball 60 ships, including two carrier battle groups — a possibility that led Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert, the chief of naval operations, to testify that the cuts could “impact the fleet for 20 to 50 years.” The Air Force might have to give up one-third of its fighters and a quarter of its long-range bombers, calling into question our nuclear deterrent. The Air Force chief of staff, Gen. Norton A. Schwartz, testified that the Air Force “may not be able to overcome dire consequences.” And the Army is likely to have to give up nearly a third of its Army Maneuver Battalions — which is why the Army chief of staff, Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, has warned that the cuts would leave us with “an unacceptable level of strategic and operational risk.” The cuts would also decimate the Marine Corps, leaving it “below the end strength level that’s necessary to support even one major contingency,” the service’s commandant, Gen. James F. Amos, has warned.

Nov 18 2011
One of the most unbelievable shifts for Gingrich is his favorability rating among New Hampshire Republicans. In August, Magellan’s polling showed that Gingrich was one of the most disliked candidates among the party faithful, with only 29 percent having a favorable view of him versus 60 percent with a negative one. That perception has completely flipped three months later. The former Speaker is now liked by 59 percent of the New Hampshire GOPers polled, versus only 31 percent who retain the negative perspective.

Nov 14 2011
PhotoAlt

If I spoke Spanish and understood statistics, it’s possible that I actually might have said something like this.

Nov 11 2011
PhotoAlt

adulting:

Just print this out and refer to it whenever you are the head of a massively powerful institution that is maybe looking the other way while people get raped. 

Nov 07 2011
PhotoAlt

azizisbored:

Wow. How lame do emails seem after seeing this. 

awesomepeoplehangingouttogether:

Mick Jagger and Andy Warhol corresponding

(Source: whereisthecoool)

Nov 03 2011
PhotoAlt

automaticallyoutstanding:

Nuclear explosion one millisecond after detonation

(via underpaidgenius)

Oct 31 2011

Oct 06 2011
PhotoAlt

ericstromberg:

I’ve never seen this before -  You can enter your email address directly into the paid ad on the search results page.